When Total Return isn’t. Is it time to reconsider how we measure stock market performance? And why you might want to exclude unrealized capital gains from your sense of wealth. Yes, I’m serious.   The issue I’ve spent years arguing that stock market investors need to look more at Total Return rather than just share prices to understand the success of an investment.[i] That is because Dividend Investors in a Stock Market are regularly shortchanged by price-only stock charts and the media’s focus on by-the-minute price changes. In contrast, Total Return incorporates the income received from an investment during the …

Written reviews Financial Times here and here Wall Street Journal Heard on the Street column The Economist (brief note in Buttonwood column) CFA Institute Blog Substack pre-review by Hunter Hopcroft of Lewis Enterprises Journal of Wealth Management (brief) ———– Podcasts and interviews Morningstar The Long View Podcast Library of Mistakes–Russell Napier HiddenForces pod New Books Network CFA Institute Podcast Brief discussion (5 min) with Tom Keene on Bloomberg Investors’ Chronicle The Motley Fool David Bahnsen’s NRO podcast Capitol Record Lawrence Strauss’s Income Matters Today Greg Denewiler’s Grow My Dollar pod

Making the rounds as a dividend investor in a stock market, I am frequently—as in everyday, as in within 5 minutes of every conversation—challenged about buybacks and their supposed superiority to dividends. So I wanted to lay out a typology of buybacks—a quick, simple matrix to save the time and energy of those asking and those answering (me) the question. As a historian, however, I need to explain briefly how the question came about it. It is not so much twisted logic as it is the logic of a twisted road. Theoretical equivalence Let’s start with a single assumption. The …

Yes, my room rater score in this video is 0 (though the spare office is consistent with being a thrifty dividend investor). But Tom Keene‘s enthusiasm for The Ownership Dividend (& in general for Routledge Business & Economics) and Paul Sweeney‘s call for more dividends from a tech giant make up for my lack of visuals in this Bloomberg Surveillance podcast from February 26. Thanks to the hosts for having me on. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2024-02-26/why-dividends-mean-more-than-stock-buybacks-video?sref=vBm6bz3t

The Economist Buttonwood Column The WSJ’s Heard on the Street Column The Financial Times Markets Opinion piece The Financial Times Unhedged Newsletter

Enjoyed the back & forth with “Ed” (Hunter Hopcroft). Looking forward to the film version, though I pity the screenwriter who has to turn The Ownership Dividend into a modern-day Graduate. 🙂 🙂 🙂 https://www.lewisenterprises.blog/p/just-one-word-dividends?  

Bringing coals to Newcastle. That’s what suggesting to UK readers that large, successful businesses would naturally distribute profits above their investment needs–that is, pay dividends–amounts to. It’s not really necessary to state it. Still, I’m grateful to Alex Newman /Investors’ Chronicle for the warm reception of the Ownership Dividend argument that the practice will be making a comeback in the US. Pierogies to Pittsburgh, anyone?

The academics need to go back to the drawing board. In just over three years, the security used to determine the so-called “risk-free rate” part of the formulas used to value stocks and the market in general has fallen 25% to 75 cents on the dollar. (It is the 10-year Treasury dating from mid 2020.) Holders of that security take little consolation that over the next seven years, it will “pull to par” and recover its full nominal value. Risk-free my foot! Using the 10-year Treasury rate (along with the mystical & backward-looking ERP) as the basis for determining the …

The credit card advert shouts “2% back on purchases.” The dividend investor in a stock market pauses to think about the cash return on his or her everyday expenditures.  Let’s consider your monthly phone bill. It’s an easy case because all of your payment (minus taxes) goes to the company. (Lots of your regular spending goes through intermediaries; the end company only gets a portion of what the consumer spends.)  Let’s say you pay $100 per month to doomscroll. That’s $1,200 per year. What’s the cash return for that spending? The large phone company based in the northeast had revenue …

Or the what happens when you outsource your brand. For the past several years, I’ve been forecasting a paradigm shift in business practices from extreme efficiency (globalized supply chains, asset light business models, just-in-time everything, financialization of the capital markets) to much greater efficacy (more vertical integration, more control over supply and distribution chains, resulting in greater resiliency, all at the cost of some operating margin). So far, the argument has fallen on deaf ears. In fact, the opposite is true. Most companies continue to outsource core and non-core competencies and focus on maximizing their financials, not their value chain. …

As a dividend investor in a stock market, I usually find myself having to make my case as a distinctly minority approach to the stock market. Dividend-focused investing has been out of favor for decades, with an academic tradition leaning against a cash-based relationship to stock ownership dating back to 1961. Sometimes, however, the anti-dividend narrative comes in a form that is so crisp, clear, and well-argued that it serves equally well as a platform for pointing out why investors might consider the opposite approach… Managers of a quantitative investment strategy recently published a compelling piece showing that the dividend …

What’s the end of the second quarter mean for the dividend investor in a stock market? Not much. It is an opportunity to count the checks, compare the total with last year’s, and measure the growth rate. Is the cashflow less, more, or the same as expected? Does the multi-year income forecast need to be revised? Beyond that, there is the usual opportunity to maximize a portfolio’s cash NPV by taking advantage of the daily repricing, sometimes wildly, of income streams that don’t change much year-to-year. (Dividend growth tends to be steady; share prices are all over the place.) In …

Dividend investors in a stock market normally see an increase in their yield on cost when their portfolio holdings periodically increase their distributions. This year, however, the dividend investor’s cash returns have gotten an extra boost from the AI stock frisson. By pushing down the prices of old-economy, major dividend payers without impairing their income trajectories, AI hysteria has increased the yield of these holdings for dividend reinvestment or new money. That is: income is going up, prices are going down, voila—rising cash returns! Sadly, such income “sales” cannot go on indefinitely. As dividends increase, the yield will eventually become …

Investors massively underestimate the importance of political economy. Our financial institutions rely on our political structures, and our political framework only really works because of certain underlying economic relationships. Separating the two realms is impossible. Think about how critical the rule of law, the inviolability of contracts, individual liberty, and an independent judiciary are for the functioning of capital markets. And in the other direction, private property, commerce, and entrepreneurship create the foundations for the liberal political order, meaning the representative democracies of the past two centuries. Adam Smith might be considered the first modern “political economist.” Karl Marx wrote …

Low Room Rater score, but more reasonable commentary about being a dividend investor in a stock market. RIA Channel interview